Ishaque Eqbal vs Maan Kesarwani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In a head-to-head match analysis, second serve performance can be a significant indicator of success. Over the past six months, Eqbal has won 41.86% of points on their second serve, while Kesarwani has managed to secure 47.24%. This statistic often correlates highly with predicting match outcomes, suggesting Kesarwani may have an edge in this aspect.

Delving into return game statistics, Eqbal has demonstrated prowess by winning 48.47% of their opponents' second serve points recently, while Kesarwani has managed 43.07%. Return stats for first serves depict Eqbal winning 24.81%, slightly outperforming Kesarwani's 22.8%. This information is crucial for determining which player holds an advantage in head-to-head matchups.

When under pressure, such as saving breakpoints, Eqbal has a current statistic of saving 52.51% compared to Kesarwani's 56.36%. This can be a vital metric for those interested in live betting predictions as it indicates resilience under pressure.

Analyzing overall yearly performance, Eqbal has won 60.53% of their matches (23 wins, 15 losses), whereas Kesarwani boasts a slightly higher win rate of 62.07% (18 wins, 11 losses). This metric provides a predictive overview of head-to-head encounters, showing a slight favoring of Kesarwani.

Both players have demonstrated different surface preferences, with Eqbal excelling on Hard courts with a 56% win rate (72-56 record) and performing a bit less consistently on Clay with a 53% win rate (17-15 record). Conversely, Kesarwani's best surface is Clay, where they achieved a 69% win rate (9-4), but only a 44% win rate on Hard courts (11-14).

Regarding player level and quality of opponents, Eqbal mostly played Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, holding a 60.53% win rate. Meanwhile, Kesarwani played against higher-ranked opponents on average (141.52 rank) compared to Eqbal's 252.84 average, potentially giving Kesarwani experience against tougher competition.

In deciding sets over the last year, Eqbal has secured victory in 70% of such matches. Kesarwani follows closely with a 67% deciding set win rate. This is a compelling statistic for those following the live match and predicting outcomes if the match extends into a final set.

Another crucial metric, breakpoint conversion, shows Eqbal converting 34.55% of opportunities, surpassing Kesarwani's 30.51%. This statistic might be instrumental for predicting critical in-game moments and possible shifts in momentum.

Considering all factors, Kesarwani seems to have a slight edge in several key areas, such as playing against higher-ranked opponents and boasting a stronger recent match win percentage. Therefore, based on the statistics, Kesarwani may have a greater chance of emerging victorious in the upcoming match.